Legal Opinion

Roggio v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 25, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2009-1733Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA VINCENT ROGGIO, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 9-1733 (TJK) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Vincent Roggio sues the FDIC, as receiver for the now-defunct Washington Mutual, for various contract and tort claims arising out of Washington Mutual’s foreclosure on two properties owned by Roggio and associated litigation in the New Jersey state courts. The FDIC moved to dismiss, arguing that all of Roggio’s claims are barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel as a result of the aforementioned New…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API