Legal Opinion

Johnson v. A. Hermann, Jr.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1930No. Appeal 62PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal is from an-order discharging plaintiff’s rule for judgment against a garnishee on answers to interrogatories.

The plaintiff, who is the appellant here, had recovered judgment against Andrew Hermann, Jr., in an action of trespass. Attachment sur judgment was issued and the. Continental Casualty Company was brought in as garnishee, interrogatories were served and answered, and the order now challenged was made.

The garnishee answered that it had no relations with Andrew Hermann, Jr., and had nothing belonging to him, but that it had insured Andrew Hermann, a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Moses v. Ferrel & Indemnity Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Nesbitt v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Ferguson v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Bianco v. Concepts" 100", Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Trainer EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API