Bianco v. Concepts" 100", Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
Appellant contends in the present attachment execution proceedings that the lower court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over appellee, a foreign insurance company authorized to do business in Pennsylvania. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the court below and remand for further proceedings.
I
On January 14, 1977, appellant commenced an action in trespass against a local retail establishment and appellee’s insured, Concepts “100”, Inc. (hereinafter Concepts), a now-defunct New York corporation then doing business in Penn sylvania. 1 Appellant alleged…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Butterfield v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Simmers v. American Cyanamid Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- A.G. Allebach, Inc. v. HurleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Freestone v. New England Log Homes, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.