Legal Opinion

Trainer Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1950No. Appeals, 121 and 122PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

These two appeals involve the same question, were argued together, and will be disposed of in one opinion. The common question is whether the interest of John J. Trainer, appellant, under two separate testamentary trusts, may be seized, while in the hands of the trustees, under a writ of attachment execution for a debt due from John J. Trainer to the plaintiff in the writ, and reduced to judgment.

The will of Edward Trainer, inter alia, provided: “SEVENTH: Upon the death of my said wife ... I give, devise and bequeath my said residuary estate . . . unto my trustees,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Austin-Nichols & Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. Hart Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Johnson v. A. Hermann, Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boyd EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Royal Bank of Pennsylvania v. SeligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Myler v. Arney (In Re Arney)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  4. Boyd EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Loose EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Berks County · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API