Moses v. Ferrel & Indemnity Co. of America
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
This is an appeal by an insurance company from a judgment entered against it on its answers to interrogatories directed to it as garnishee in an attachment sur judgment proceeding. The facts giving rise to the controversy are as follows: In 1925 appellant issued to one, W. L. Ferrel, a policy indemnifying him f‘ against loss occasioned by the ownership or operation” of his automobile. The policy contained, inter aha, the following provisions: “The company will indemnify the assured against loss resulting from claims or suits arising from bodily injuries or death…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Pfeiler v. Penn Allen Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cameron v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- MacEy v. CrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- West v. MacMillan (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
- Ferguson v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.