Legal Opinion

Spruill v. Summerlin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1981No. 806DC686PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

We disagree with defendants’ position that the evidence as presented by plaintiff and the opinion of this Court in Cardwell v. Ware, 36 N.C. App. 366, 243 S.E. 2d 915, disc. rev. denied, 295 N.C. 548, 248 S.E. 2d 726 (1978), compelled the granting of a directed verdict on the grounds of plaintiffs contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Plaintiff presented evidence that she turned onto Highway #13 in a steady rain, travelled approximately eight hundred feet, allowed a car to pass going in the opposite direction and attempted to turn left into a driveway. Plaintiff testified…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mintz v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Cardwell v. WareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blankley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Church v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Phillips v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1986
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API