Legal Opinion

Lenz v. Ridgewood Associates

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1981No. 8118SC289PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In one of his assignments of error, plaintiff contends the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. We agree with plaintiffs argument and reverse.

The grounds stated by defendants in their motion clearly define the issues in the appeal. Defendants’ motion asserted that because the evidence showed the ice on defendants’ premises resulted from a natural accumulation, defendants had no duty to plaintiff; but that if there were a duty, defendants had not breached it; and that if there were evidence of a duty and a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Merrill v. JansmaWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Brooks v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Diorio v. PennyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Jackson v. Housing Authority of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API