Legal Opinion
Amatulli v. People's Bank
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1996No. 5:88-cv-00568PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIMS
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Robert Davidson, together with twenty-one other investors, brought this action against defendant, People’s Bank, alleging fraud in connection with his investment in five limited partnerships. Defendant counterclaimed for judgment against plaintiff on the six promissory notes executed by plaintiff in connection with the investments.
Defendant moves for summary judgment on the promissory notes pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. Plaintiff responded and a ruling on the motion was deferred until…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Topf v. Warnaco, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Delacroix v. Lublin Graphics, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
- McNally v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009