Hollander v. Kressman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The appeal in this action of attachment sur judgment questions the refusal of the lower court to enter judgment in favor of the garnishee notwithstanding the verdict.
In 1935 the defendant Kressman, then the owner of a number of trucks, contracted with Gorberg the present garnishee to haul his produce at a package rate. In 1937 a judgment for $1,500 was entered by the plaintiff Hollander against Kressman and his trucks were seized on execution and were sold in January 1938. On January 28, 1938 plaintiff served Gorberg with the attachment sur judgment involved in this appeal.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fulweiler v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
- Krell v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Wagner-Taylor Co. v. McDowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Bradley v. RhodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Integrity Trust Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Devlin v. PiechoskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Bell v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Tremont Township School District v. Western Anthracite Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Houston-Starr Co. v. DavenportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Austin v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.