Legal Opinion

Devlin v. Piechoski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1953No. Appeal, 152PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff, James Devlin, administrator' of the estate of Rosella Devlin, deceased, sued the defendant, Joseph Piechoski, in trespass for damages. on two causes of action, viz., wrongful death and survival, growing out of -the death of Rosella in the crash of .an airplane which Piechoski was piloting by leave of the owner.

*641Pieehoski having failed to appear, the prothonotary, upon praecipe, entered judgment for the plaintiff under Rule 1047 R.C.P. for want of an appearance and answer by the defendant. The quantum of the damages was later fixed by the court after a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Carroll v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Commonwealth v. Monongahela Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Stradley v. Bath Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Signora v. Liberty Travel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Zimmer v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Fox v. GablerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. A.C. Elfman & Sons, Inc. v. ClimeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API