Legal Opinion

Austin v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County

Decided November 22, 1972No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ACKER, J.,

This action in equity is an effort to force Westinghouse Electric Corporation to discontinue a wage garnishment upon a valid judgment obtained against plaintiff in the State of Ohio. The effect of the proposed order would be to either force Westinghouse to stand a possible contempt citation in Ohio for failure to comply with the order there obtained or to honor the judgment in Ohio and pay the debt for plaintiff from its own funds. The law, equity and facts are all against plaintiff’s position.

From a stipulation plaintiff is employed in Sharon, Mercer County, Pa., by defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Milwaukee County v. M. E. White Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re LiptakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API