Legal Opinion

Bell v. Roberts

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1942No. Appeal, 57PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, J.,

Opinion by

This appeal is from an order of the court below dissolving an attachment issued against the Philadelphia Transportation Company for the purpose of reaching in its hands, as garnishee, a fund payable to Hugh Roberts, Esq., the defendant and a member of the Philadelphia Bar, as an attorney’s fee allowed him by order of the United States District Court for legal services connected with the reorganization of the garnishee, the former Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company.

The plaintiff, John C. Bell, Jr., as Secretary of Banking of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Wolfe v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  2. Hamberger v. MarcusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Firmstone v. MackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
  4. Catlin v. EnsignSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857
  5. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shearer v. Oberdick (In re Oberdick)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Eastern Lithographing Corp. v. SilkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Houston-Starr Co. v. DavenportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Pasos v. FerberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. United States v. GerdelDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API