Legal Opinion

Integrity Trust Company v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 1933No. Appeal, 209PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pm Cukiam,

May 22, 1933:

This appeal is from an order of the lower court quashing an attachment issued upon a judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover sums due upon defendant’s promissory notes. The Stanley Company of America was summoned as garnishee and made answer to the interrogatories filed. From these answers, it appears there is in garnishee’s hands a balance due Taylor under the terms of a written contract for his personal services made in 1917 with J. F. Zimmerman. This court, in Taylor v. Stanley Company of America, 305 Pa. 546, determined that the contract referred to above was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Stanley Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Danziger v. FerberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Diamond T. Motor Car Co. v. PattersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Eastern Lithographing Corp. v. SilkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Hollander v. KressmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Wagner-Taylor Co. v. McDowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Mills Automatic Merchandising Co. v. Brown, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API