Legal Opinion
Koeppel v. Daluiso
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1931No. Docket No. 512PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Appellants are husband and wife. At about 1:30 o’clock on the afternoon of October 22, 1929, May Koeppel was injured by either running into or being struck by an automobile driven by respondent on Third Street in the city of San Bernardino, at a point within what is designated as the central traffic district by ordinances of the city of San Bernardino. This action was brought to recover damages for the injuries suffered by appellants. A jury returned a verdict in favor of respondent, and, after the denial of their motion for new trial, this appeal was taken from the judgment.
Third Street is a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Sheldon v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Perry v. Angelus Hospital AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lindenbaum v. BarbourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Morris v. Purity Sausage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Flores v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Gibb v. CleaveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.