Legal Opinion
Lindenbaum v. Barbour
California Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 10704PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was instituted by plaintiff against defendant to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her in a collision between an automobile in which she was riding, owned by her husband and operated by her twenty-one year old son, and' an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The jury returned a verdict of $2,500 in favor of plaintiff and defendant has appealed.
The collision occurred at the intersection of Linden Street and Foothill Boulevard, in the county of San Bernardino, near the town of Rialto. Foothill Boulevard is a public highway running in a general…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Keyes v. HawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Atlas Mixed Mortar Co. v. City of BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Enz v. JohnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Gritsch v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Dodge v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Lossman v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Koeppel v. DaluisoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.