Legal Opinion

Rose v. Ingram

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1884No. 11,239PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

Appellee sued appellants to amend an execution by attaching the seal to it, and to quiet his title to certain real estate purchased thereunder.

A demurrer was overruled to the complaint; there was a trial by the court, finding for the plaintiff, and, over a motion for a new trial, judgment was rendered on the finding.

The errors assigned are the overruling of the demurrer to the complaint, and overruling motion for a new trial.

The first objection made to the complaint is that it shows that the execution, withouta seal, was void, and not amendable, and in support thereof we are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hunter v. Burnsville Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Reily v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Doe, on the Demise of Wilkins v. RueIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
  5. Jones v. CarnahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ross v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Leonard v. BroughtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Richey v. MerrittIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Houston Oil Co. v. RandolphTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Hensen v. PeterWashington Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API