Legal Opinion

Doe, on the Demise of Wilkins v. Rue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1837PublishedCited by 18 opinions

ERROR to the Wayne Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

This was an action of ejectment for a quarter section of land in Wayne county. Plea, not guilty; and judgment for the defendants. ‘

The defendants moved to amend twq executions against Wilkins, the lessor, under which, with another, the land in dispute had been sold by the coroner, and purchased by William Reniston, under whom the defendants claimed. This motion was granted, and the executions were accordingly amended. The making of these amendments is assigned for error.

The first execution which was amended, was in favour -of Barker against Wilkins for 25 dollars and six cents. The judgment…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bissell v. KipNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Columbian Insurance v. CatlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Brown v. H. & E. T. BettsNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Stewart v. SeveranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  3. Martin v. PiferIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Martindale v. PalmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Houston Oil Co. v. RandolphTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API