In re Jung
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
On this rehearing, we adopt the following statement of the facts from our former opinion:
*200‘‘ This proceeding was instituted by The State Bar to revoke the license of the respondent Charles Joe Jung to practice law in all the courts of this state on the ground that it was obtained through misrepresentation and concealment in that respondent made false answers to several material questions in his sworn application for admission to practice. Respondent was thereupon directed to show cause before this court why the order admitting him to practice law should not be revoked. Thereafter he…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Marson v. RandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Jones v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Sautter v. Contractors' State License BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- State Bar v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In re Martin's Retail Liquor License No. 1517District Court, D. Alaska · 1954