Legal Opinion

In Re Ervin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 25, 2010No. 26816PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary matter, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) brought formal charges against Respondent William Grayson Ervin following his arrest for pointing and presenting a firearm. The Panel recommended Respondent be suspended for two years retroactively, pay the costs of the proceeding, and attend counseling for two years. We believe a lesser sanction is warranted and suspend Respondent for six months retroactive to the date of his interim suspension.

I

Respondent graduated from college in 2004 and then worked as a police officer in Horry County for a year and a half. Following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re JordanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. In Re SorensonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. In Re HartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James Robert KeeleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  3. In re CarneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. In Re CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API