Legal Opinion

In Re Sorenson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 10, 2008No. 26562PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and respondent have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, in which respondent admits misconduct and agrees to either an admonition or a public reprimand. We accept the agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

FACTS

On April 4, 2008, respondent was served with four arrest warrants charging him with unlawful gaming and betting on four separate occasions, July 14, 2007, March 15, 2008, March 29, 2008, and March 31, 2008. During the time period…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ErvinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. In the Matter of Barry Scott SuggsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API