Legal Opinion
Ladd v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 9, 2013No. 2012-5086, 2012-5087PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Jack Ladd et. al. (landowners) appeal from the Court of Federal Claims’s (CFC) dismissal of their taking claims as barred by the statute of limitations. Because the landowners’ claims are not time-barred, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. We affirm the remaining issues appealed.
BACKGROUND
This appeal is the second appeal in this rails-to-trails case. See Ladd v. United States, 630 F.3d 1015 (Fed.Cir.2010) (Ladd I). Ladd I details the procedural history of this case, which we repeat only as necessary to resolve this second appeal.
The landowners own tracts of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Laitram Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Nec Corporation and Nec Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Scott Timber Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Caquelin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Biery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Caquelin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Bell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.