Bell v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Class Certification; RCFC 23; Size of the Individual Claims
OPINION and ORDER
CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge
This is an inverse condemnation matter brought by six named plaintiffs against the United States International Boundary and Water Commission (defendant or the government). Plaintiffs seek just compensation under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution for defendant’s alleged physical taking of their property.
Plaintiffs own real property in the state of Texas, along the Mexican border, near the Rio Grande River. It is undisputed that defendant holds…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Silver Buckle Mines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- BAUER v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.