Legal Opinion
Scott Timber Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 26, 2003No. 02-5142PublishedCited by 141 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
On summary judgment, the United States Court of Federal Claims determined that the United States Forest Service did not breach Scott Timber Company’s timber sales contracts. See Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 40 Fed.Cl. 492 (1998) (Scott I); Scott Timber Co. v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 170 (1999) (Scott II); Scott Timber Co. v. United States, Nos. 94-784C, 96-204C, slip op. at 49 (Fed.Cl. filed July 11, 2001) (Scott III). This dispute arose when the Forest Service suspended Scott’s performance on the timber contracts to protect the marbled murrelet, a tiny bird…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Robertson v. Seattle Audubon SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Metcalf Construction Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Ace Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.