Mason v. Farm Credit of S. Colo.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE RICE delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 In this case, we consider whether the petitioner was entitled to a jury trial under Rule 38 of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. The court of appeals held that the petitioner was not entitled to a jury trial because the claims in the respondents' original complaint were primarily equitable. Farm Credit of S. Colo., ACA v. Mason , 2017 COA 42 , --- P.3d ----. In drawing this conclusion, the court of appeals ignored the claims in the respondents' amended complaint. That was in error. As in other contexts, for purposes of the civil…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Kaitz v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Leaffer v. ZarlengoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Johnson v. NeelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- v. DIA Brewing CoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- In Re Marriage of DurieSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- v. Center for ExcellenceColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- CenturyLink, Inc.; Glen F. Post, III; R. Stewart Ewing, Jr.; David D. Cole; William A. Owens; Martha H. Bejar; Virginia Boulet; Peter C. Brown; W. Bruce Hanks; Jeffrey K. Storey; Steven T. Clontz; Mary L. Landrieu; Gregory J. McCray; Harvey P. Perry; Michael J. Roberts; Laurie A. Siegel; and Sunit S. Patel v. Dean HouserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2026
- Edgar Oganesyan, et al. v. Rakuten USA, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.