Legal Opinion

Edgar Oganesyan, et al. v. Rakuten USA, Inc., et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 25, 2026No. 4:25-cv-01534Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EDGAR OGANESYAN, et al., Case No. 25-cv-01534-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 RAKUTEN USA, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 65 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Consolidated Class Action 15 Complaint (the “CAC”), Dkt. No. 60, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of 16 Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6). Motion to Dismiss 17 (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 65. The Court…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API