Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Neel

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 26, 1951No. 16483PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.. We will herein refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court, where plaintiffs in error were named “petitioners,” and defendant in error was named “respondent.”

Petitioners sought to remove a cloud upon the title to real estate owned by them and located in La Plata county, which cloud allegedly was created by the filing by respondent of a mechanic’s lien. The specific grounds upon which petitioners sought’the removal of said cloud upon their title were: That any labor performed in the construction of the dwelling house and garage mentioned in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Hayward v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Kalloch v. ElwardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  4. Munsell v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Parker v. PlymptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital Building Corp. v. HamillIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Garhart Ex Rel. Tinsman v. Columbia/HealthOne, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Gleason v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. Mozes v. DaruCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API