Plant Flour Mills Co. v. Barag
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
This is an action on a trade acceptance for $1,587.50, given for flour sold by plaintiff to defendant.
Defendant, by way of defense to the whole of plaintiff’s claim, set up the breach of an alleged implied warranty of quality, to wit, that the defendant had ordered “good” flour, which, it was alleged, meant in the trade, flour containing eleven and one-half per cent of proteins and having a high gluten content, whereas, the affidavit of defense averred, the flour shipped “contained protein and gluten in a considerably less amount,” without stating, however, the quantity…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Descalzi v. North American Fruit ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Plympton Cabinet Co. v. RosenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Hausman Buttler v. Dougherty SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Container Corp. v. Regal Corrugated Box Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Bell v. MainDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943