Hausman Buttler v. Dougherty Sons
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cunningham, J.,
Plaintiffs brought their action in the municipal court of the County of Philadelphia to recover from defendants a balance alleged to be due under a written order for the manufacture of certain stools. By the pleadings it was admitted that $600 had been paid on account of a total consideration of $1,000 and the suit was for the balance. The parties waived a jury and the trial resulted in a finding by the judge that plaintiffs were not only not entitled to recover anything but should return to defendants the $600 received on account. This appeal is by the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spiegelberg v. KarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Tete Bros. v. EshlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Hickman v. ShimpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- McGlinn v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- American Watch Tool Co. v. Reed Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Plant Flour Mills Co. v. BaragSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Bornstein v. Hanes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
- Rumsey Electric Co. v. Heat Seal-It Co.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1947