Legal Opinion

Hausman Buttler v. Dougherty Sons

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1928No. Appeal 330PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

Plaintiffs brought their action in the municipal court of the County of Philadelphia to recover from defendants a balance alleged to be due under a written order for the manufacture of certain stools. By the pleadings it was admitted that $600 had been paid on account of a total consideration of $1,000 and the suit was for the balance. The parties waived a jury and the trial resulted in a finding by the judge that plaintiffs were not only not entitled to recover anything but should return to defendants the $600 received on account. This appeal is by the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spiegelberg v. KarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Tete Bros. v. EshlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  3. Hickman v. ShimpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. McGlinn v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. American Watch Tool Co. v. Reed Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plant Flour Mills Co. v. BaragSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bornstein v. Hanes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
  3. Rumsey Electric Co. v. Heat Seal-It Co.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API