Descalzi v. North American Fruit Exchange
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
Plaintiffs brought this action against the defendant to recover damages for breach, of warranty in the sale and delivery of certain cars of fruit sold them by it. The statement filed claimed damages on three ears of grapes, one car of pears and one car of apples. The proof on the trial, as to the grapes, was limited to two cars. The statement set up an express warranty that the fruit was to be sound, merchantable and fit for human consumption. There was no evidence produced of any express warranty as to quality, except that 277 baskets of pears were to be extra fancy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Beymer v. BonsallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
- Robinson v. WallaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Catalano v. CorcoranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- C. D. Brown Co., Inc. v. Stand. H. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Brookside Distilling Products Corp. v. Monarch Wine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Nusbaum v. Warwick Hotel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.