Legal Opinion

Public Utilities Commission v. Garviloch

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1919No. 3350PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; H. M. Stephens, Judge. Action by the Public Utilities Commission of Utah against Mike Garviloeh. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

*408The Public Utilities Commission of Utah, hereinafter called commission, commenced this action in the district court of Salt Lake county to enjoin the defendant from operating a certain “automobile stage line.” The commission, in its complaint, in substance alleged that on April 2, 1918, one Eugene Chandler made application to the commission for a “certificate of convenience and necessity,” as required by the Utilities Act of this state, to operate “a stage line between Bing-ham Canyon and Highland Boy mine, and between Bingham Canyon and Copperfield in Salt Lake county”; that there: after a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Commonwealth v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. City of Memphis v. State ex rel. RyalsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. MayoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1909
  5. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. GrassmeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Public Utilities Commission v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Motor Transit Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Frost v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Morel v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Davis & Banker, Inc. v. NickellWashington Supreme Court · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API