Legal Opinion
Motor Transit Co. v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 1922No. S. F. No. 10099PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
Petitioners in this proceeding seek to have reviewed by this court an order of the Railroad Commission directing the cessation of service by the petitioner Motor Transit Company “as a transportation company for the transportation of persons or property for compensation between the termini of Santa Ana and Anaheim and intermediate points.” The hearing before the commission arose out of a complaint by one auto stage company against the alleged unlawful operations of a competing auto stage company between the cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana.
The “A. R. G. Bus Company,” prior to May 1, 1917,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Oro Elec. Corp. v. R.R. Comm'n of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Williams Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Diaz v. QuitorianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.