Legal Opinion
Fox v. Workman
California Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1909No. L.A. No. 2206PublishedCited by 10 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an action brought to recover from the defendant Workman, as treasurer of the city of Los Angeles, and the sureties upon Ms official bond, damages in the sum of five thousand dollars for the refusal of Workman to comply with plaintiff’s demand that he sell a certain tract of land in order to satisfy a street-improvement bond (Stats. 1893, p. 33), held by plaintiff and claimed by him to be a lien upon the land. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone.
From the findings it appears that the bond, and the assessment upon which it was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Southern California Railway Co. v. WorkmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- State ex rel. Hull v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Douglas v. Town of ChathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Pacific R.R. Co. v. StibbensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Schaffer v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hardy v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Los Angeles Railway Corp. v. Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.