Legal Opinion

People v. Iniguez

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1994No. S030379PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

Defendant Hector Guillermo Iniguez admitted that on the night before Mercy P.’s wedding, he approached her as she slept on the living room floor, removed her pants, fondled her buttocks, and had sexual intercourse with her. He further conceded that he had met Mercy for the first time that night, and that Mercy did not consent to any sexual contact or intercourse. The Court of Appeal reversed defendant’s conviction for rape on the grounds that the evidence of force or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury was insufficient. We granted review to determine whether there…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United States v. Bolanos-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Ruiz-ApolonioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. People v. BambaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API