Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1992No. S022660PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

Our task is to delineate the circumstances under which a trial court is required to give a requested instruction regarding a rape defendant’s bona fide and reasonable, but mistaken, belief of consent to sexual intercourse. We conclude that the instruction was not warranted in this case, and hence reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

*357I. Facts and Procedural Background

On Saturday, November 4, 1989, Deborah S. and her sister Jenny S. were staying at the Episcopal Sanctuary homeless shelter at Eighth and Market Streets in San Francisco. They had arrived in San Francisco…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. MayberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. BabbittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. People v. EwoldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. BerrymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API