People v. Bamba
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
In the published portion of this case, we hold that Penal Code section 236 is neither unconstitutionally vague nor overbroad.
A jury convicted appellant Frank Greg Bamba of one count of assault with a deadly weapon (a van) (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)), 1 one count of felony false imprisonment (§§ 236/237), and one count of possessing methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)). The jury further found appellant had personally used a deadly weapon in committing the assault.
In a bifurcated trial, the court found appellant had suffered two prior robbery…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. IslasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Campbell v. Feld Entertainment, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.