Legal Opinion

United States v. Ruiz-Apolonio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 2011No. 10-50306PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Pablo Ruiz-Apolonio appeals the 46-month sentence of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea to one count of illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because we agree with the district court that a conviction for forcible rape under California Penal Code § 261(a)(2) is categorically a “crime of violence” as defined by the Sentencing Guidelines, we hold that the district court correctly imposed a 16-level sentencing enhancement. We also hold that the district court did not commit procedural error in calculating the Guidelines range and that the sentence of 46…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Venancio Rojas-PedrozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. UrenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Joe ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Djeneba Sidibe v. Sutter HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API