United States v. Ruiz-Apolonio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
Pablo Ruiz-Apolonio appeals the 46-month sentence of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea to one count of illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because we agree with the district court that a conviction for forcible rape under California Penal Code § 261(a)(2) is categorically a “crime of violence” as defined by the Sentencing Guidelines, we hold that the district court correctly imposed a 16-level sentencing enhancement. We also hold that the district court did not commit procedural error in calculating the Guidelines range and that the sentence of 46…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Venancio Rojas-PedrozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. UrenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ludwin Lopez-Aguilar v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Joe ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Djeneba Sidibe v. Sutter HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.