Legal Opinion
Putnam Park Associates v. Fahnestock & Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 15, 2002No. AC 21789PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding $31,413.27 in liquidated damages to the plaintiff, Putnam Park Associates, for breach of a written lease contract by the defendant, Fahnestock and Company, Inc.. The trial court found that the defendant, who was the tenant under the lease, had breached its duty to pay “additional rent,” over and above a base level of rent, to cover certain variable “excess expenses.” The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) refused to hold that the plaintiffs allegations in its complaint were insufficient to sustain the judgment, (2)…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- United Illuminating Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Colliers, Dow & Condon, Inc. v. SchwartzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Young v. VlahosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. v. Property Operating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- KLM Industries, Inc. v. TylutkiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.