Legal Opinion
KLM Industries, Inc. v. Tylutki
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 11, 2003No. AC 22308PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant John Voloshin1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court holding him personally hable on a debt incurred by the defendant Home Investment Corporation, LLC2 (Home Investment), to *29the plaintiff, KLM Industries, Inc., and ruling that the plaintiff was a proper party to seek payment of the debt. The plaintiff cross appeals, claiming that the court improperly ruled in favor of Voloshin on the third and sixth counts of the complaint, which alleged that Voloshin had forged or knowingly benefited from a forged lien waiver. We reverse in part and affirm in part the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Zaist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Landry v. SpitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Troutwine Estates Development Co. v. ComSub Design & Engineering, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- AE Restaurant Associates, LLC v. Giampietro (In Re Giampietro)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.