Legal Opinion

Sparks v. . Holland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSohbnck, J.

We will consider the several assignments of error brought forward in the appellant’s brief in the order in which they are there presented. The other assignments in the record which are not mentioned in the brief are deemed to be waived. Rule No. 28 of Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 200 N. C., 811 (831).

The first assignment of error is to the court’s permitting counsel for the plaintiff to inquire of the jurors being selected if they had any business connection with the American Casualty Company. The following appears in the record:

“The court, not in the presence of the jury, and at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Western N. C. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Fulcher v. Pine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Walters v. Durham Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Marriner v. . MizzelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Olguin v. ThygesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Taylor v. BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Lee v. ReganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Kizer v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Lane v. Eastern Carolina Drivers AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API