Legal Opinion

Walters v. Durham Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Lyon, J., at January Term, 1914, of DURHAM.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This ease was here at the last term, and is reported in 163 N. c., at p. 536. Nearly all of the questions now raised in this appeal were decided at,that time.

First. Plaintiff, for the purpose of exercising his right of challenge, was permitted to ask the.jurors, then in the box, over defendant’s objection, if any of them had any business connection or relation with the Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, it having been admitted that defendant was insured by that company against loss on account of this claim to a certain amount. It seems to us that this objection is fully answered on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Pressly v. Yarn Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Walters v. Durham Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Akin v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Orr v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faris v. Burroughs Adding Machine Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Oliphant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Taylor v. J. A. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Sparks v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Luchessi v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API