Legal Opinion

Kizer v. Bowman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1962No. 27PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The appellant’s first thirteen exceptions and assignments of error are directed to the refusal of the court below to strike certain allegations in the complaint. However, in our opinion, the alie- gations which the defendant sought to have stricken from the complaint were not prejudicial to him. Therefore, these exceptions and assignments of error based thereon are overruled.

Assignments of error Nos. 37 and 38 are directed to the failure of the trial court to sustain defendant’s motion for judgment as of non-suit interposed at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed when the defendant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Carraway v. RevellSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Bridges v. SpeerSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Cadore v. KarpSupreme Court of Florida · 1957

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Shaw v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Taylor v. BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Mosqueda v. MosquedaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Young v. GlennCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API