Legal Opinion

Lee v. Regan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1980No. 7914SC1087PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant has brought forward eight arguments on appeal. All eight address one issue, the evidence and proof of damages, particularly the evidence and proof of damages relating to the preexisting syringomyelia. Our State recognizes the “special sensitivity” or “thin skull” rule. According to this rule, a negligent defendant is subject to liability for harm to the plaintiff although a physical condition of plaintiff which is neither known nor should be known to defendant makes the injury greater than that which defendant as a reasonable man should have foreseen as a probable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Potts v. HowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Thompson v. LockertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Ward v. WentzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Garland v. ShullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Britton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Felts v. Liberty Emergency Service, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Shaver v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Taylor v. EllerbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Felts v. Liberty Emergency Service, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API