Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 23, 1929No. 27,317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

The interveners in their complaint in intervention sought to recover $7,000 for their services in an action of the plaintiff, for whom they appeared, against the defendant railway company for personal injuries, which action was settled by the railway company directly with the plaintiff. The case came on for-trial before Judge Frank M. Nye. Two issues were submitted to the jury, which were found in favor of the defendant railway company. Judge Nye granted a new trial, not for errors of law but because of the insufficiency of the evidence. The same issues then came on for a second trial before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. United States Roofing & Paint Co. v. MelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Lockwood v. BockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  5. Lincoln v. RaviczSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Nielsen v. BralandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Marty v. NordbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Johnson v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API