Wilson v. Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Petitioner Gregory Wilson, who is an inmate at a Department of Corrections institution, and his wife Stormii Wilson, who is not, challenge the validity of a department rule that prohibits inmates from receiving “[s]exually explicit material which by its nature or content poses a threat or is detrimental to the security, good order or discipline of the facility, inmate rehabilitation, or facilitates criminal activity ***” OAR 291-131-0035(l)(a).1 Petitioners contend that the rule violates their freedom of expression as guaranteed *556by Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. We conclude…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Afshin Bahrampour v. R.O. Lampert, Superintendent Debbie Holland Teresa Hicks Kathy StevensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. J. B. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Nay v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Barrett v. Oregon Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Byers v. Dept. of Corrections (A174503)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Hessel v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.