Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 27, 2013No. A152053PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Petitioner Gregory Wilson, who is an inmate at a Department of Corrections institution, and his wife Stormii Wilson, who is not, challenge the validity of a department rule that prohibits inmates from receiving “[s]exually explicit material which by its nature or content poses a threat or is detrimental to the security, good order or discipline of the facility, inmate rehabilitation, or facilitates criminal activity ***” OAR 291-131-0035(l)(a).1 Petitioners contend that the rule violates their freedom of expression as guaranteed *556by Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. We conclude…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Afshin Bahrampour v. R.O. Lampert, Superintendent Debbie Holland Teresa Hicks Kathy StevensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. State v. PlowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. J. B. V.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Nay v. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Barrett v. Oregon Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Byers v. Dept. of Corrections (A174503)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Hessel v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API