Legal Opinion

Afshin Bahrampour v. R.O. Lampert, Superintendent Debbie Holland Teresa Hicks Kathy Stevens

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2004No. 02-35194PublishedCited by 205 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:

Afshin Bahrampour seeks reversal of the summary judgment entered in favor of the prison officials of the Oregon Department of Corrections (collectively “ODC”). In his pro se complaint, Mr. Bahrampour alleged that ODC violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights to freedom of speech and due process by refusing to deliver certain pieces of mail to him. In a separate, supplemental claim, he alleged that this conduct also violated his state constitutional right to freedom of speech under Article 1, Section 8 of the Oregon Constitution.

We affirm the portion of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Thornburgh v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Ross W. Sorrels v. Ronald McKee David Buss Cly Evans Archie Grant Loreli, Cruthers Kay Walter Jim Blodgett Joseph LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Rick Summers v. A. Teichert & Son, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by205 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. BonvicinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Prison Legal News v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Grenning v. KlemmeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
  5. Anthony King v. Federal Bureau of Prisons and Charles GilkeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API