Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Oregon Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2013No. A150406Published

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks a determination under ORS 183.400 of the validity of OAR 291-131-0035. That rule, promulgated by the Department of Corrections, prohibits inmates from receiving “[s]exually explicit material which by its nature or content poses a threat or is detrimental to the security, good order or discipline of the facility, inmate rehabilitation, or facilitates criminal activity * * Petitioner contends that the rule “[violates constitutional provisions,” ORS 183.400(4)(a), because it violates his freedom of expression under Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. Petitioner…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Wilson v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API