Legal Opinion

Nay v. Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 2014No. A150722PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Petitioner seeks a judicial declaration, pursuant to ORS 183.400(1), that certain amendments to administrative rules promulgated by respondent, the Department of Human Services (DHS), are invalid. Petitioner asserts that DHS improperly amended OAR 461-135-0832(10)(b)(B)(viii) and OAR 461-135-0835(l)(e)(B)(iii) (the challenged rules)1 to expand Oregon’s Medicaid “estate recovery” provisions to encompass assets owned by a Medicaid recipient at the time of the recipient’s death, in addition to assets that the recipient conveyed to the recipient’s spouse or others within five years of the date of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Washington State Department of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of KeffelerSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nay v. Department of Human ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Dinicola v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. HobartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API