Legal Opinion
Transcontinental Insurance v. Faler
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 27, 1973No. 1391-1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
— Transcontinental Insurance Company brought this action against the State of Washington, the City of Seattle, and several other municipal corporations to have a professional liability policy which it had issued to George K. Faler declared inapplicable to an action brought against him and two other attorneys by those governmental bodies. Transcontinental moved for summary judgment which was granted. The governmental bodies and Faler appeal.
Faler, an attorney, appears pro se. He has not filed a brief, and the judgment, as to him, is affirmed. CAROA 41(3).
The facts may be stated as follows:…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cadwallader v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Dulberg v. MockNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of BeakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Harris v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- O'NEILL v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Bank of California, N. A. v. W. H. Opie, California Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Perl v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Jefferson-Pilot Fire & Casualty Co. v. Boothe, Prichard & DudleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.