Legal Opinion

O'NEILL v. Gray

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 18, 1929No. 159PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The first objection raised by the defendant is the statute of limitations. An action for malpractice must be commenced within two years after the cause of action has accrued. New York Civil Practice Act, § 50. This term has been regarded by the courts as embracing unskillful or illegal practice by doctors or dentists, which results in physical injuries to the person. It is coupled in the statute with other purely personal wrongs— “libel, slander, assault, battery, seduction, criminal conversation, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution.” The injured…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Quigley v. . ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Engel v. . Eureka ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Burke v. . IrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Riddle v. . MacFaddenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Oleyar v. Kerr, TrusteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. Fuschetti v. BiermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Goodstein v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  4. Hillhouse v. McDowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Glens Falls Insurance v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API