Legal Opinion

Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1943No. 9494PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

The controversy presented here originated in the United States Patent Office. In interference proceedings there, the Examiner of Interferences was affirmed by the Patent Office Board of Appeals in his holding that Blair and Schott, assignors of appellant Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Company, had established priority of invention with respect to nine article claims of their issued Patent No. 2,032,832. Both the Examiner and the Board held, however, that priority of invention had not been established by appellant’s assignors with respect to the method of making…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Christie v. SeyboldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  4. Radtke Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heston v. KuhlkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  2. Heston v. KuhlkeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1948
  3. Tucker v. Dr. P. Phillips Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  4. Zalkind v. ScheinmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API